Topicle Betaash2449đŠđș
Joined 2 days ago
Account based in Australia
I think a core problem modern social media face is the fact that bots are everywhere and can get around a ton of systems.
IDs mean little when a ton of id info can be found in the dark web from hacks and leaks
Paying for check marks also doesnât mean much when they can use stolen card info and other online methods.
The most reliable check I have seen is the whole âuse your camera to check your face while holding your id to confirm itâs youâ, so a checkmark that requires this would actually mean something.
Guess they shouldnt have tried to force raids down everyone's throat via the elitist guardian ranks system.
I enjoyed the lore and universe of density, even solo dungeons were very fun, but when like your typical mmorpg dev realise people arent doing your raids, the solution is not to force it down their throat.
Oh this explains why the rules felt so stifling since they were copied from auspolitics xd.
I see what you mean, the idea if you want to focus on the main rules so subs dont get to create mini dictators with utterly ridiculous rules.
In this case, you could create a ruleset dial, where a sub can for example choose one of 3 pre-made rulesets but has no power to change the rules within them. (Would obviously need to evolve as more feedback comes)
Like for example:
-Strict = Strict posting standards, no editorialising, no posts or comments with less than X words, stay on topic, good faith, stricter enforcement of no fighting in the comments and keep it civil.
-Standard = Your more average ruleset where editorialising is ok if it isnt overly politicised, post quality is not strict so you can reply with 1 word, some banter is allowed but keep it civil and in general not ultra serious but neither loose.
-Loose = For shitposting and silly memes, dumb arguments and fights allowed so long they dont turn actually hateful/toxic. Not meant for serious civil discussions so shouldnt be used for communities of serious subject unless it is meant to be a parody of said subject.
The IHRA definition comes along with 11 examples, 7 of which are designed specifically to connect jewish people to Israel and thus call anything anti israel, anti semetic.
I mean one of the example says "Dont call Israel policy the same as the nazis" which is absurd, when Israel adopts nazi like policies, they should correctly be compared to nazis.
As if the gaza genocide isnt enough, now they are erasing entire villages from Lebanon's map by blowing up everything, this is crazy bloodthirsty warmongering behaviour and should be called out for what it is
Some people will definitely not like it, but I am more of the mind that if you are gonna have to do it, at least try to do it right.
It is probably more expensive to do a serious check but it would allow the platform to be advertised as a human only platform.
Something i feel it going to be more desired as bots take over normal social media and you cant trust you are talking to a real person anymore, plus the fact that all the interaction statistics kinda become irrelevant when inflated by bot numbers.